Market signal
Automation versus alert-only operation
Evergreen NOVA operator education for guarded Polymarket BTC signal execution.
View market source →Not every signal should become an order.
For some operators, alerts are the right product. For others, guarded automation makes sense after checks are complete. NOVA separates those modes because they solve different problems.
Alerts are best when judgment still matters
An alert is useful when the operator wants to see the signal but keep the final decision manual.
This can be the right mode when the account is new, the operator is still learning the market, liquidity is uneven, or the signal has not been reviewed across enough windows.
Alerts also help when the operator wants to compare signal quality against their own notes before allowing any live execution.
No-submit previews are the middle lane
No-submit mode is stronger than an alert because it shows what the automation would have done. It can preview market choice, side, and size while still avoiding real orders.
This is the mode NOVA should use before live activation. It turns abstract trust into concrete review.
Live automation needs explicit consent
Live automation should only happen after payment, credentials, market mapping, and risk caps are clear.
The operator should know what the setup can do and what it cannot do. They should also know the maximum approved exposure before the first live window.
When to stay manual
Stay manual if the market is thin, the signal is delayed, the account credential changed recently, the operator cannot explain the risk cap, or the no-submit result does not match the expected action.
Manual mode is not failure. It is the correct mode when the setup is not ready.
The operator takeaway
The best setup is not always the most automated setup. NOVA should move from alerts to previews to live mode only when the controls support it.